Better recognised on older face prototypes. There was no clear pattern for surprise and fear. This may be due to differences in the intensity/clarity of expressions that the child models produced compared to the adult models. Anecdotally, we noticed that children were more likely to exaggerate expressions for the photographs, particularly the angry expression. Alternatively, it may be that certain expressions are more readily recognised on child faces as opposed to adult faces due to age related differences in the shape of facial features [8]. In Actinomycin IV site conclusion, we found no evidence of an own-age bias in emotion recognition in child and adult participants using younger child, older child, and young adult emotional expression prototypes. Instead we found that emotions were recognised as accurately on child age and adult age faces by all age groups. These results strongly suggest a lack of own-age bias in emotion recognition in children. However further studies with greater numbers of adult subgroups and aPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0125256 May 15,10 /No Own-Age Advantage in Children’s Recognition of Emotionbetter match between the ages of adult participants and the ages of adult face stimuli, will be needed to confirm a lack of own-age bias in emotion recognition in adults.AcknowledgmentsWe thank staff at At-Bristol for supporting our data collection activities. Marcus Munaf?is a member of the UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, a UK Clinical Research Council Public Health Research: Centre of Excellence. Funding from British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and (-)-Blebbistatin site Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, and the National Institute for Health Research, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration, is gratefully acknowledged.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: SG ISP CJ MRM. Performed the experiments: SG. Analyzed the data: SG ISP CJ MRM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ISP MRM. Wrote the paper: SG ISP CJ MRM.
OPEN ACCESS Citation: Corneli A, Perry B, Agot K, Ahmed K, Malamatsho F, Van Damme L (2015) Facilitators of Adherence to the Study Pill in the FEM-PrEP Clinical Trial. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0125458. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0125458 Academic Editor: J. Gerardo Garcia-Lerma, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, UNITED STATES Received: October 7, 2014 Accepted: March 20, 2015 Published: April 13, 2015 Copyright: ?2015 Corneli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper. Due to FHI 360’s data use policy and ethics restrictions, FHI 360 will make study data available upon request. Individuals interested in accessing the data should contact the corresponding author. Funding: FEM-PrEP was conducted under two grants funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID): the Contraceptive and Reproductive Health Technologies and Research Utilization Program, and the Preventive Technologies Agreement No. GHO AFEM-PrEP did not demonstrate a reduction in HIV acquisition because of low study pill adherence. Yet, plasma and intracellular drug concentrations indicated that some participants had evidence of recent pill use. We conducted a follow-up study to identify, among other t.Better recognised on older face prototypes. There was no clear pattern for surprise and fear. This may be due to differences in the intensity/clarity of expressions that the child models produced compared to the adult models. Anecdotally, we noticed that children were more likely to exaggerate expressions for the photographs, particularly the angry expression. Alternatively, it may be that certain expressions are more readily recognised on child faces as opposed to adult faces due to age related differences in the shape of facial features [8]. In conclusion, we found no evidence of an own-age bias in emotion recognition in child and adult participants using younger child, older child, and young adult emotional expression prototypes. Instead we found that emotions were recognised as accurately on child age and adult age faces by all age groups. These results strongly suggest a lack of own-age bias in emotion recognition in children. However further studies with greater numbers of adult subgroups and aPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0125256 May 15,10 /No Own-Age Advantage in Children’s Recognition of Emotionbetter match between the ages of adult participants and the ages of adult face stimuli, will be needed to confirm a lack of own-age bias in emotion recognition in adults.AcknowledgmentsWe thank staff at At-Bristol for supporting our data collection activities. Marcus Munaf?is a member of the UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, a UK Clinical Research Council Public Health Research: Centre of Excellence. Funding from British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, and the National Institute for Health Research, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration, is gratefully acknowledged.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: SG ISP CJ MRM. Performed the experiments: SG. Analyzed the data: SG ISP CJ MRM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ISP MRM. Wrote the paper: SG ISP CJ MRM.
OPEN ACCESS Citation: Corneli A, Perry B, Agot K, Ahmed K, Malamatsho F, Van Damme L (2015) Facilitators of Adherence to the Study Pill in the FEM-PrEP Clinical Trial. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0125458. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0125458 Academic Editor: J. Gerardo Garcia-Lerma, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, UNITED STATES Received: October 7, 2014 Accepted: March 20, 2015 Published: April 13, 2015 Copyright: ?2015 Corneli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper. Due to FHI 360’s data use policy and ethics restrictions, FHI 360 will make study data available upon request. Individuals interested in accessing the data should contact the corresponding author. Funding: FEM-PrEP was conducted under two grants funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID): the Contraceptive and Reproductive Health Technologies and Research Utilization Program, and the Preventive Technologies Agreement No. GHO AFEM-PrEP did not demonstrate a reduction in HIV acquisition because of low study pill adherence. Yet, plasma and intracellular drug concentrations indicated that some participants had evidence of recent pill use. We conducted a follow-up study to identify, among other t.