O conduct a posthoc analysis in which “phase within the task
O conduct a posthoc analysis in which “phase in the task” was integrated as a aspect. A threeway mixed ANOVA with group (highlow socially anxious) as the betweensubjects element, and mirror (presentabsent), and phase (trials to four, trials 5 to 30, trials 3 to 44) as withinsubjects aspects was performed. The main impact of group remained considerable. Furthermore, there was also a primary effect of phase, F(two, 88) 9.9, p, .00, g2 .09, indicating that participants estimated that extra men and women were looking at them as the task progressed. Importantly, there was also a significant phase six group 6 mirror interaction, F(2, 88) four.92, p .0, g2 .05. Figure 2 illustrates this interaction. To further investigate this interaction, separate twoway (group, mirror) ANOVAs had been conducted for each phase in the experiment. Within the first phase, there was a key impact of group,Figure . Improve of high and low socially anxious participants’ estimates with boost of objective proportion of individuals looking in their EGT1442 direction. Error bars show normal errors. doi:0.37journal.pone.006400.gMirror manipulation checkIt was expected that the mirror manipulation would improve selffocused consideration. We have been also interested to find out no matter if it enhanced selfevaluation and anxiety. Twoway mixed ANOVAs together with the betweensubjects aspect group (highlow socially anxious) plus the withinsubjects factor mirror (presentabsent) had been conducted to investigate the effects from the mirror manipulation on these variables. There were principal effects in the mirrors for concentrate of interest, F(, 94) 57.98, p, .00, g2 .38, and anxiousness, F(, 94) 22.three, p, .00, g2 .9, indicating that participants have been extra selffocused and more anxious when the mirrors were present. There have been also key effects of group for concentrate of interest, F(, 94) 8.83, p, .0, g2 .09, and for anxiousness, F(, 94) 38.four, p, .00, g2 .29, indicating that higher socially anxious folks were more selffocused and much more anxious than low socially anxious folks. The group 6 mirror interactions for focus of interest, F(, 94) three.46, p .07, g2 .04, and anxiety, F(, 94) 2.7, p .0, g2 .03, did not attain significance, indicating that the selffocused interest and anxiety inducing effect in the mirrors didn’t differ considerably involving the two groups. For selfevaluation, the twoway ANOVA revealed a principal impact with the mirrors, F(, 94) five.09, p, .00, g2 .4, and also a major effect of group, F(, 94) 25.79, p, .00, g2 .22, which have been certified by a group six mirror interaction, F(, 94) eight.2, p, .0, g2 .08. Separate paired ttests within higher and low socially anxious participants revealed that higher socially anxious participants were substantially more selfevaluative when the mirrors had been present, t(47) 4 p, .00. Low socially anxious participants did not drastically differ in selfevaluation within the two mirror circumstances, t(47) 0.90, p .37. General, the mirror manipulation enhanced selffocused focus and anxiousness in high and low socially anxious folks, but only enhanced selfevaluation in the high socially anxious participants. This finding is consistent with Clark Wells’ cognitive model [9], which proposes that selffocused interest and selfevaluation go hand in hand in folks with high socialPLOS One plosone.orgEstimation of Being Observed in Social AnxietyTable 2. High and low socially anxious participants’ estimates of your PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24126911 proportion of individuals within the crowds who have been looking at them.High socially anxious (n 48) Mirro.