Rm model can. This outcome shows that the adsorption of Cs the adsorption of Cs far better than Freundlich’s isotherm model can. This outcome shows that the adsorption of Cs happens via a mostly occurs via a singlelayer of Cs by geomaterials mostly by geomaterials singlelayer reaction, and the maximum reaction, and capacity is estimated to be 89.32 mg s estimated to become isotherm parameters adsorption the maximum adsorption capacity g 1 . The attached 89.32 mg 1. The attached that the fly ashbased show that the are ashbased geomaterials are extra effective show isotherm parameters geomaterials fly extra powerful for adsorbing Cs ions. for adsorbing Cs ions.Table 4. Coefficient of Langmuir and TPA-023B Autophagy Freundlich isotherms for Cs. Langmuir Isotherm Sample qmax (mg 1 ) 89.32 44.52 KL (L g1 ) 0.1665 0.02126 R2 0.9948 0.9954 Freundlich Isotherm KF ((mg 1 )(dm3 g1 )1/n ) ten.75 20.55 1/n 0.01620 0.04660 R2 0.1309 0.Fly ash SlagAppl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER Assessment Appl. Sci. 2021, 11,11,FOR PEER Review Appl. Sci. 2021, x14 of 18 14 13 18 17 of of90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 ten 10 0 0 0y = 22.464x two.0942 y = 22.464x two.0942 R= 0.9954 R= 0.Ce Ce/qe/qey = 11.196x 0.5365 y = 11.196x 0.5365 R= 0.9948 R= 0.9948 1 1 2 two C 3 3 4Fly ash Fly ash Slag SlagCeeFigure 8. The Theadsorption from the Langmuir isotherm around the on the fly ashbased geomaterials and Figure eight. Cs Cs adsorption in the Langmuir isotherm fly ashbased geomaterials and slagFigure 8. The geomaterials. on the Langmuir isotherm around the fly ashbased geomaterials and slagbased geomaterials. slagbased Cs adsorption based geomaterials.two 2 two.2 two.two two.4 two.four two.six 2.6 2.8 2.eight 3 3 three.2 3.2 1 3.4 1 3.y = 0.0162x two.3749 y = R= 0.1309 0.0162x 2.3749 R= 0.lnq lnqe ey = 0.0466x three.0227 y = 0.0466x three.0227 R= 0.3698 R= 0.Fly ash Fly ash Slag Slag0.5 0.0lnCe lnCe0.5 0.11.five 1.Figure 9. The Cs adsorption from the Freundlich isotherm on the fly ashbased geomaterials and Figure 9. The Cs adsorption on the Freundlich isotherm around the fly ashbased geomaterials and slagslagbased geomaterials. Figure 9. The Cs adsorption from the Freundlich isotherm on the fly ashbased geomaterials and slagbased geomaterials. primarily based geomaterials. three.5. Adsorption Nifekalant InhibitorMembrane Transporter/Ion Channel|Nifekalant Technical Information|Nifekalant In Vitro|Nifekalant manufacturer|Nifekalant Cancer} Mechanism Table four. Coefficient of Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms for Cs. Table four.The adsorption of cesium on fly ashbased geomaterials and geomaterials doped with Coefficient of Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms for Cs.slag was studied. The influence in the pH with the remedy, the adsorbent dosage, plus the Langmuir Isotherm Freundlich Isotherm Langmuir Isotherm Freundlich Isotherm contact time around the adsorption efficiency were discussed. The following matters could be KF Sample qmax KL KF regarded as: ((mg 1)1/n R2 R2 Sample (mg 1) qmax KL (L g1) ((mg 1)1/n 1/n R2 R2 Cs on (dm3 g1))geomaterials and slagbased (1) The(mg 1) adsorption experiment information of fly ashbased (L g1) 3 g1)1/n) (dm10.75 Fly ashgeomaterials conform for the Langmuir isotherm adsorption equation. The isothermal 89.32 0.1665 0.9948 0.01620 0.1309 fitting in the Langmuir model shows that the surface is heterogeneous, which indicates Fly ash 89.32 0.1665 0.9948 ten.75 0.01620 0.1309 Slag 44.52 0.02126 0.9954 20.55 0.04660 0.3698 that the adsorption of Cs around the surface with the 20.55 adsorbent mostly occurred as singleSlag 44.52 0.02126 0.9954 0.04660 0.3698 layer adsorption. 3.five. Adsorption Mechanism (two) The ideal match was obtained using the pseudosecondorder kinetic model whilst inves3.five. Adsorption Mechanism.