Quality” Table 2. Contingency table, column relative frequencies (percentages): “Do you believe that organic Answers Year Healthier Tastier Much more Attractive Creatinine-D3 Metabolic Enzyme/Protease Higher Excellent foods are healthier, tastier, extra attractive, or of greater quality”Definitely yes AnswersDefinitely yes Rather yesRather noRather noRather yesDefinitely noDefinitely noI Idon’t know never know2016 Year 2019 2016 2016 2019 2019 2016 2016 2019 2019 2016 2019 2016 2016 2019 2019 2016 2016 201920.Healthier 22.14 20.21 56.86 22.14 56.22 56.86 15.53 56.22 13.78 15.53 13.78 three.53 3.53 3.84 3.84 3.86 three.86 four.01 four.7.72 Tastier 10.11 7.72 33.53 10.11 37.68 33.53 38.29 37.68 32.75 38.29 32.75 7.72 7.72 8.19 eight.19 12.74 12.74 11.28 11.4.Much more Appealing 9.94 4.52 26.13 9.94 31.83 26.13 47.33 31.83 37.43 47.33 37.43 12.24 12.24 10.69 10.69 9.78 9.78 ten.11 ten.27.Higher Top quality 24.06 27.36 49.06 24.06 52.05 49.06 15.37 52.05 14.12 15.37 14.12 two.71 2.71 three.93 3.93 five.51 5.51 five.85 5.Source:Own calculations. Supply: Own calculations.2D Plot of Row and Column Coordinates; Dimension: 1 x two Input Table (Rows x Columns): 4 x five Standardization: Row and column profiles 0,Dimension two; Eigenvalue: ,00173 (1,450 of Inertia) 0,ten 0,08 0,06 0,04 0,02 0,00 -0,02 -0,04 -0,06 -0,08 -0,ten -0,12 -0,5 -0,4 -0,three -0,two -0,1 0,0 0,1 0,two I don’t know Tastier Definitely yes Healthier Ciprofloxacin (hydrochloride monohydrate) MedChemExpress Larger Excellent Rather yes Rather not Undoubtedly not A lot more Eye-catching 2D Plot of Row and Column Coordinates; Dimension: 1 x two Input Table (Rows x Columns): four x 5 Standardization: Row and column profilesDimension 2; Eigenvalue: ,00654 (3,301 of Inertia)0,Healthier Rather yes Certainly not A lot more Attractive0,0,00 Tastier -0,05 Higher High quality Undoubtedly yes -0,Rather not-0,I never know-0,20 -0,-0,-0,-0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Dimension 1; Eigenvalue: ,18675 (94,22 of Inertia)Row.Coords Col.CoordsDimension 1; Eigenvalue: ,11656 (97,54 of Inertia)Row.Coords Col.CoordsFigure 2. Correspondence map: “Do you believe that organic foods are: healthier, tastier, a lot more appealing, of greater quality” 2. Correspondence map: “Do you think that organic foods are: healthier, tastier, much more eye-catching, of larger quality” Year 2016 year year 2019 (proper). Source: Personal calculations. Year 2016 (left), (left),2019 (proper). Source: Personal calculations.Table two and Figure 2 (proper) describe the situation in 2019. According to the survey, organic meals in 2019 was viewed as healthier, as well as of greater high-quality than standard food, although not far more appealing; see the table and also the correspondence map (p-value is less than 0.001, chi-square = 572.13, degrees of freedom = 12). The survey revealed a optimistic shift in organic meals reputation, see Table three. The proportion of respondents who under no circumstances purchased organic meals plunged to half of its original level. However, we recorded an increase within the variety of respondents who didn’t care whether it was organic or not. Considerable statistical dependence was proven (p-value is significantly less than 0.001, chi-square = 88.02, degrees of freedom = 3).Agriculture 2021, 11,The survey revealed a optimistic shift in organic meals popularity, see Table 3. The proportion of respondents who never purchased organic meals plunged to half of its original level. Even so, we recorded a rise inside the quantity of respondents who did not care regardless of whether it was organic or not. Important statistical dependence was verified (p-value is 7 of 16 less than 0.001, chi-square = 88.02, degrees of freedom = three).Table three. Contingency table, column relative frequencies (percentage.