Inferred thatof 24 12 the frequency of summer daytime and nighttime has been rising for the previous 33 years.Figure five. The seasonal trend magnitudes of heat and cold duration indices at the UGRB. Figure 5. The seasonal trend magnitudes of heat and cold duration indices at the UGRB.three.three. Month-to-month Trends 3.3. Month-to-month Trends The month-to-month trend magnitudes from January to December are summarized in Tables A7 18. The monthly trend magnitudes from January to December are summarized in Tables A7 18. Goralatide TFA precipitation three.3.1. PrecipitationThe benefits of month-to-month trend analysis of all precipitation indices in the UGRB would be the final results of month-to-month trend analysis of all precipitation indices at the UGRB are shown in Figure 6.six. Based the trend results of precipitation frequency indices, the month shown in Figure According to around the trend final results of precipitation frequency indices, the month (April, (April, July, October) was Nitrocefin custom synthesis observed with decreasing (growing) R10 and of June of June July, October) was observed with decreasing (rising) trends intrends inR20 indices; which suggests that the UGRB has been experiencing an increasing (decreasing) frequency of events with heavy-to-heavy precipitation the month of June (July, October). Moreover, a weak escalating trend within the R10 index in the course of August has been observed; which suggests an enhanced frequency of events with heavy precipitation hasWater 2021, 13,12 ofR10 and R20 indices; which suggests that the UGRB has been experiencing an growing (decreasing) frequency of events with heavy-to-heavy precipitation the month of June (July, October). Furthermore, a weak escalating trend inside the R10 index throughout August has been observed; which suggests an improved frequency of events with heavy precipitation has been observed for the last 33 years, at the UGRB. In addition, it was also observed that there was no change in trends in the precipitation frequency indices at Jeonju station. Primarily based Water 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEWon these findings, it can be inferred that Jeonju station has been experiencing no adjustments in 13 of 24 precipitation frequency patterns.Figure 6. The monthly trend magnitudes of all precipitation indices in the UGRB. Figure 6. The month-to-month trend magnitudes of all precipitation indices at the UGRB.Additionally, the outcomes from the precipitation intensity indices shows that a massive 3.three.two. Temperature decrease (improve) inside the trend magnitude in June (July, August, and October) has been The monthly trend magnitudes of each of the temperature intensity indices are shown in observed. These findings may suggest that five UGRB has been experiencing decrease (larger) Figure 7. The TNn index has been observed with month-to-month precipitations for the month daily precipitation intensities, and lesser (more) growing trends for all months in all stations (July, August, andstation in April and June. These findings may recommend recommend of June except for Jangsu October), for the previous 33 years. These findings may well that the coldest nighttime temperature for of June, to months of July, August, and October. precipitation shifts in the month every month, has been warming given that 1988. In addition, the TNx index was also observed with consistent growing trends for all months, 3.three.two. Temperature except in April, and September, which suggests that the warmest nighttime temperatures through April and September, has been all 5 temperature intensity indices months have the month-to-month trend magnitudes of acquiring colder, while the remainin.