Orption 20(S)-Hydroxycholesterol References experiment was carried out, as shown in Figure 11. In this
Orption experiment was carried out, as shown in Figure 11. In this experiment, very first, we pre-adsorbed 1M1C-1 in Hg0 -containing N2 for 120 min, then the mercury supply was cut off and the total flue gas flow was kept constant. When the Hg0 concentration in the flue gas was reduced to 2 0 /m3 , we added 0.12 SO2 for the flue gas. It might be seen that the Hg0 concentration in Overview gas swiftly enhanced to 20.1 /m3 , and then gradually decreased to 0 /m3 . the flue This indicates that the introduction of SO2 into the reaction system will lead to the desorption 0 of your weakly adsorbed mercury two the PK 11195 Epigenetic Reader Domain surface in the adsorbent, indicating that SO2 and on 0 are competitively adsorbed during the removal of Hg0 by 1M1C-1. HgFigure 10. Impact of SO2 on the mercury removal efficiency of 1M1C-Figure 10. Effect of SO2 on the mercury removal efficiency of 1M1C-1.Hg0 concentrationCompared with the side reactions, competitive adsorption portion from the inhibition. Thus, so as to further below sorption behavior of SO around the surface of 1M1C-1, a mercury was carried out, as shown in Figure 11. In this experiment, firs 1 in Hg -containing N for 120 min, then the mercury supply w gas flow was kept constant. When the Hg concentration inside the 100 g/m3, we added 0.12 SO2 towards the flue gas. It can be seen that th Hg0 adsorption in N2 Hg g/m3, flue gas rapidly improved to 20.10 desorption after which gradually d 80 indicates that the introduction of SO2 in to the reaction program w the weakly adsorbed mercury around the surface with the adsorbent, i 60 are competitively adsorbed during the removal of Hg0 by 1Mcout /(mg -3)40 Hg0 cut off 20 0 0 30 60 90 Time0.12 SO2 in120 150 t /minFigure 11. Impact of SO2 around the desorption of mercury on 1M1C-1.Effect of HClFigure 11. Effect of SO2 on the desorption of mercury on 1M1C-1.Effect of HClFigure 12 shows the impact of distinct volume fractions moval overall performance of 1M1C-1. We could see that just after 0.001 the reaction technique, the typical mercury removal efficiencyFigure 12 shows the effect of various volume fractions of HCl on the mercury removal overall performance of 1M1C-1. We could see that right after 0.001 HCl was introduced into the reaction system, the average mercury removal efficiency improved by 3.4 to 89.3 , indicating that the addition of a little quantity of HCl has a advertising effect on theSeparations 2021, eight,the electrons of Mn develop into Mn , as well as the electrons lost by ch chlorine atoms, and then the active chlorine atoms along with the ads generate HgCl, which in turn generated HgCl2. When the HCl 13 of 17 to 0.003 , the mercury removal efficiency only improved to 90 to 0.005 , the mercury removal efficiency hardly improved. T fraction, the of 1M1C-1. Because it isafter the adsorbent reached the high mercury removal decline trend difficult for Hg0 to directly react with HCl below 4+ a N2 atmosphere and decrease temperature, it ciency reaction of Equations (6)eight) happens is speculated that Mn adsorbed around the surface became more apparent. ThisFirst, HCl is existsinthe adsorbent is due to the fact in an oxygen-fr and also the [3,29,41]. in the adsorbent by of HCl is high, theto type O oxygen Mn l bonds, separation and adsorption surface bonds and on the adsorbe concentration 4+ plus the electrons of Mn turn into Mn3+ , plus the electrons lost by chloride ions come to be the conversion of HCl the active chlorine atoms andHCl will compete wi active chlorine atoms, then and the remaining the adsorbed state Hg0 reacted to produce HgCl, ering some activewhich.