In the Basilicata area (hereafter named: Antalis_BA); and (iii)(iii
Inside the Basilicata region (hereafter named: Antalis_BA); and (iii)(iii) cv. Antalis, grown in grown in the Basilicata area (hereafter named: Antalis_BA); and cv. Antalis, grown inside the Marche region (hereafter named: Antalis_MA). The plants had been grown in experimental the Marche area (hereafter named: Antalis_MA). The plants were grown in experimental fields below traditional farming throughout the 2018019 increasing season. fields below traditional farming during the 2018019 developing season. two.two. GrainGrain Characterization 2.two. CharacterizationGrain samples evaluated for test test weight, moisture and MCC950 NOD-like Receptor protein content, gluten Grain samples werewere evaluated forweight, moisture and protein content material, gluten percentage and yellow color via near-infrared analysis in transmission mode (NIT) percentage and yellow color by way of near-infrared analysis in transmission mode (NIT) by using InfratecTM mod 1241 (FOSS, Hiller , Denmark). Figure shows the flow chart of by using InfratecTM mod 1241 (FOSS, Hiller , Denmark). Figure 1 1 shows the flow chart in the experimental program. the experimental program.RAW MATTER (whole grain)MICRONIZATIONPRELIMANARY Top quality ASSESSMENT Infratec (mod. 1241, FOSS)AIR-CLASSIFICATIONCOLLECTION OF FRACTIONS (G230, G250 and F250)ANALYSES FROM MILLING SAMPLES TO PASTAFigure 1. Flow of your experimental plan. Figure 1. Flow chart chart in the experimental strategy.2.3. Complete Grain Micronizationand Air Classification two.three. Whole Grain Micronizationand Air Classification Durum wheat grain samples (11 kg per each and every grain sample) have been micronized applying Durum wheat grain samples (11 kg per every grain sample) have been micronized working with a a micronizer pilot plan (mod. 32300, KMXi-300-7,five; Separ Microsystem S.a.s, Brescia, micronizer pilot micronization stepKMXi-300-7,five; Separ Microsystem S.a.s, Brescia, Italia). The Italia). The program (mod. 32300, did not call for a preventive conditioning in the grains. The micronization stepplantnot need a preventive conditioning of impeller with a lowered micronizing pilot did was equipped with a hammer crusher the grains. The micronizing pilot plant was equipped with a hammer crusher impellertraditional form, a sieving cross-section inside the grinding chamber. Compared to the having a reduced crosssection inside the grinding chamber. Compared homogeneous solution was added for the program. grid (= 0.7 mm) suitable to acquire a additional to the classic kind, a sieving grid (= 0.7 Afterwards, the micronized sample was submitted to was added for the plan. Aftermm) suitable to obtain a extra homogeneous solution an air-classifier pilot plant (model wards, the micronized sample was submitted Italia) air-classifierapilot plant (model a Tianeptine sodium salt Formula setting SX-LAB; Separ Microsystem S.a.s, Brescia, to an suitable for particle size up to SXLAB;limit ( 1.five mm). Much more Brescia, Italia) suitable to get a particlekg had been air-classified for Separ Microsystem S.a.s, in detail, micronized aliquots of two.0 size up to a setting limit each cycle (in total 3in detail, micronized aliquots of 2.0 kg had been air-classified for At ( 1.five mm). More cycles) at a time by setting the airflow inlet valve at 230 and 250. every single the end of each and every cycle the fractions of kind G (heavier grossinlet valve and F (fine particles) cycle (in total 3 cycles) at a time by setting the airflow particles) at 230 and 250. In the endcollectedcycleonlyfractions of form G (heavier submitted to evaluation. (finesteps in the were of every but the G230, G250 and F250 were gross particles) and F Al.